Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements of Nidek AL-Scan and Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoriddervisogullari, mehmet serdar/0000-0003-2006-2906
dc.contributor.authorDervisogullari, Mehmet Serdar
dc.contributor.authorTotan, Yuksel
dc.contributor.authorGuragac, Betul
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-24T18:08:59Z
dc.date.available2025-10-24T18:08:59Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentMalatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: We aimed to compare anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements between the Nidek AL-Scan and the Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer. Setting: Turgut Ozal University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey. Design: Prospective masked bilateral randomized study. Methods: Sixty-three individual patient eyes with normal ocular examination findings and no prior ocular surgery were analyzed. Paired two-tailed t-test was used to evaluate agreement between devices. Interobserver repeatability was evaluated in 22 patients using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The mean +/- standard deviation (+/- SD) ACD for Nidek and Galilei was 3.57 +/- 0.29 (range from 2.92 to 4.32) and 3.65 +/- 0.29 (range from 3.01 to 4.40), respectively. Comparing the two instruments using paired samples t-test, a statistically significant difference was found between the measurements obtained for ACD (P = 0). Two observers' intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were 0.996 for Nidek and 0.968 for Galilei. For Nidek, ACD mean difference was 0 mm (P < 0.001); 95% limits of agreement was from -0.05 to 0.05. For Galilei ACD mean difference was -0.01 mm (P < 0.001); 95% limits of agreement was from -0.14 to 0.12. The Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer measured longer ACD values than the Nidek AL-Scan. Conclusion: This comparative study showed that the difference in ACD between the measurements of the Nidek AL-Scan and the Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer was statistically significant but clinically it was negligible. Further studies are needed, especially on IOL calculation formulas that include ACD and its effect on postoperative spherical equivalent values. C) 2014 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clae.2014.01.003
dc.identifier.endpage88
dc.identifier.issn1367-0484
dc.identifier.issn1476-5411
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pmid25467288
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84930378133
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage85
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2014.01.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12899/3397
dc.identifier.volume38
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000351019400003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bv
dc.relation.ispartofContact Lens & Anterior Eye
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_20251023
dc.subjectAnterior chamber depth; Digital Scheimpflug Analyzer; Optical biometer
dc.titleComparison of anterior chamber depth measurements of Nidek AL-Scan and Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu