Comparison of antirotation proximal femoral nail and talon locking nail systems in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: functional and cost-effectiveness outcomes
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2025
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Springer
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Özet
Purpose This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of two widely used intramedullary fixation systems-the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and the Proximal Femoral Nail with Talon Locking System (PFN-TLS)-in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITFF). MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on 118 patients aged 65-90 years who underwent surgical treatment for ITFF using either PFNA (n = 53) or PFN-TLS (n = 65). All patients were followed for a minimum of 24 months. Preoperative functional evaluation was unavailable; outcomes were assessed at 24 months postoperatively. Surgical parameters, complication and revision rates, functional outcomes (Harris Hip Score [HHS], Visual Analog Scale [VAS], and SF-36), and health-economic indicators (Quality-Adjusted Life Years [QALY], Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio [ICER]) were evaluated. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of favorable functional outcomes. Results The PFN-TLS group demonstrated significantly shorter surgical duration, reduced incision length, and lower fluoroscopy exposure (p < 0.05). At the 24-month follow-up, HHS was significantly higher in the PFN-TLS group (82.7 +/- 7.4) compared to the PFNA group (76.4 +/- 8.1; p = 0.001). VAS and SF-36 scores were also higher, although not statistically significant. Revision rates showed a non-significant trend favoring PFN-TLS. QALY gains were slightly higher in the PFN-TLS group (0.530 vs. 0.449), with a lower cost per QALY ($1,637.93 vs. $1,863.22). PFN-TLS use was independently associated with favorable functional outcomes (OR: 2.62; 95% CI 1.23-5.58; p = 0.013). Conclusion Both PFNA and PFN-TLS are effective options for the management of ITFF. However, PFN-TLS may offer additional clinical and economic benefits, including improved functional outcomes and greater cost-efficiency. Findings should be interpreted with caution due to the retrospective design. Prospective, randomized studies are needed to validate these results and guide implant selection in clinical practice.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Antirotation Proximal Femoral Nail, Cost-Efficiency, Intertrochanteric Fractures, Proximal Femoral Nails With Talon Locking System
Kaynak
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
WoS Q Değeri
Q2
Scopus Q Değeri
Q1
Cilt
145
Sayı
1
